Заказать изготовление по индивидуальному дизайну или купть памятник по выгодной цене Вы можете в нашей Гранитной мастерской <a href="https://nisp.ru">Памятник за рубль</a>
<a href="https://1001oracul.ru/love/k-chemu-snitsya-umershaya-snoha-k-chemu-snits...Сны</a> — интересная тема, которая волнует многих людей. Сон имеет свой смысл и поддается толкованию с помощью популярных сонников. В данной статье мы расскажем о самых известных сонниках — Цветкова и разъясним, как понять сны с их использованием.
<a href="http://www.socioforum.ru/post308716.html">Сонник Фрейда</a>
Толкование по Фрейду отличается тем, что влечение и подавленные желания как ключевые аспекты сновидений. По мнению Фрейда сновидческий процесс — это способ узнать свои внутренние конфликты.
<a href="http://ericche.com/sobchak.htm">Сонник Нострадамуса</a>
Толкования Нострадамуса известен благодаря предсказаниям будущего. По Нострадамусу, сны могут дать предчувствие в жизни человека.
<a href="http://byz.ru/articles.php?article_id=60">Сонник Юнга</a>
Сны по Юнгу базируется на концепции универсальных образов. Юнг верил, что сновидения связаны с глубинными архетипами.
<a href="http://kabanik.ru/page/land-of-nod">Сонник Лоффа</a>
Сонник Лоффа ориентирован на индивидуальный опыт. Согласно Лоффу, каждый человек создает собственные образы, поэтому значение снов должно быть индивидуальным.
<a href="http://kabanik.ru/page/land-of-nod">Семейный сонник</a>
Семейный сонник подходит для всех членов семьи. Толкования семейного сонника близкие нам символы.
<a href="http://kabanik.ru/page/land-of-nod">Русский сонник</a>
Русский сонник базируется на народной мудрости. Толкования отражают древние верования и включают известные образы.
<a href="http://www.myslash.ru/Products/dirid_34/tek_641/">Мусульманский сонник</a>
Исламский сонник содержит религиозные символы. В мусульманской традиции сон интерпретируется с точки зрения религии.
Интерпретация сновидений поможет лучше понять свою жизнь и даст возможность заглянуть в будущее.
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken зайти</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out. https://kra23c.cc
kraken darknet onion
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>кракен</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
kra cc
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive. https://kra23c.cc
kra23 cc
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
Drug information. Cautions.
<a href="https://diflucan1day.top/">can i get cheap diflucan without dr prescription</a>
All news about drugs. Read information here.
Заказать изготовление по индивидуальному дизайну или купть памятник по выгодной цене Вы можете в нашей Гранитной мастерской <a href="https://nisp.ru">смотреть онлайн бесплатно</a>
New Glenn’s first flight
Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
<a href=https://kra23att.cc>kraken зайти</a>
The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.
Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.
Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car. https://kra23att.cc
kraken магазин
Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.
The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.
“We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.
And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken войти</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening. https://kra23c.cc
kraken
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
Я увидел превосходный сайт [url=cosmotrah.com]Анкеты шлюх Тюмени[/url].
Тут размещены анкеты отличных девушек легкого поведения из города Тюмень.
Выбор просто великолепный по адекватным ценам.
[url=cosmotrah.com]Анкеты девиц легкого поведения Тюмени[/url]. https://cosmotrah.com
<a href="https://cosmotrah.com">проститутки тюмени</a>
Всего лишь поделился :)
Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken darknet onion</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken войти
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken тор</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive. https://kra23c.cc
kraken войти
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>кракен ссылка</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out. https://kra23c.cc
kraken тор
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
Заказать изготовление по индивидуальному дизайну или купть памятник по выгодной цене Вы можете в нашей Гранитной мастерской <a href="https://nisp.ru">русское бесплатно</a>
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>Кракен даркнет</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening. https://kra23c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
Займ на карту без отказа — это быстрое и удобное решение для тех, кто нуждается в финансовой помощи: простая онлайн-заявка, минимальные требования к заемщику и мгновенное одобрение, что позволяет получить необходимую сумму практически незамедлительно, а также возможность быстро погасить задолженность, делая процесс максимально комфортным и прозрачным для каждого <a href="https://vc.ru/money/1745226-top-17-novyh-mfo-kotorye-odobryayut-zaimy-na...займы на карту онлайн</a>
Pills information leaflet. Brand names.
<a href="https://ampicillin1day.top/">how to get cheap ampicillin pill</a>
Actual information about drugs. Get now.
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken магазин</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive. https://kra23c.cc
kraken войти
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken darknet</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
кракен онион
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken market</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out. https://kra23c.cc
kraken вход
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken darknet</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening. https://kra23c.cc
kra cc
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
Medication information for patients. What side effects can this medication cause?
<a href="https://mobic1day.top/">buying generic mobic</a>
All what you want to know about drug. Read here.
Заказать изготовление по индивидуальному дизайну или купть памятник по выгодной цене Вы можете в нашей Гранитной мастерской <a href="https://nisp.ru">Памятник в рассрочку бесплатно</a>
Comments (80068)
generic51.ru (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:05
https://generic51.ruhttps://generic51.ru/kombinirovannye
AngelaGop (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:17
use our free 3DVista app foruse our free 3DVista app for iOS and Android to create different tours on phone or tablet with [url=https://deubel.com.ar/producto/alfajorcitos-de-chocolate-x12u/]https://d....
kmoiqes (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:24
<a href="https://goreotuma.ru<a href="https://goreotuma.ru">gore2</a>
Rogerfibia (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:25
http://maxpillsformen.com/#http://maxpillsformen.com/# Tadalafil Tablet
Robertatosy (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:27
Заказать изготовление поЗаказать изготовление по индивидуальному дизайну или купть памятник по выгодной цене Вы можете в нашей Гранитной мастерской <a href="https://nisp.ru">Памятник за рубль</a>
Толкование снов... (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:29
<a href="https://1001oracul<a href="https://1001oracul.ru/love/k-chemu-snitsya-umershaya-snoha-k-chemu-snits...Сны</a> — интересная тема, которая волнует многих людей. Сон имеет свой смысл и поддается толкованию с помощью популярных сонников. В данной статье мы расскажем о самых известных сонниках — Цветкова и разъясним, как понять сны с их использованием.
<a href="https://banyaplus.ru/the-signs-of-the-zodiac/sonnik-k-chemu-snitsya-muzh...Сонник Миллера</a>
Сонник Миллера состоит на глубоком исследовании содержания сновидений. Миллер писал, что сон показывают, как поступить в трудной ситуации и отражают наше подсознание.
<a href="http://www.socioforum.ru/post308716.html">Сонник Фрейда</a>
Толкование по Фрейду отличается тем, что влечение и подавленные желания как ключевые аспекты сновидений. По мнению Фрейда сновидческий процесс — это способ узнать свои внутренние конфликты.
<a href="http://ericche.com/sobchak.htm">Сонник Нострадамуса</a>
Толкования Нострадамуса известен благодаря предсказаниям будущего. По Нострадамусу, сны могут дать предчувствие в жизни человека.
<a href="http://byz.ru/articles.php?article_id=60">Сонник Юнга</a>
Сны по Юнгу базируется на концепции универсальных образов. Юнг верил, что сновидения связаны с глубинными архетипами.
<a href="http://kabanik.ru/page/land-of-nod">Сонник Лоффа</a>
Сонник Лоффа ориентирован на индивидуальный опыт. Согласно Лоффу, каждый человек создает собственные образы, поэтому значение снов должно быть индивидуальным.
<a href="https://fin-omen.ru/tolkovanie-snov-k-chemu-snitsya-ovca.html">Сонник Ванги</a>
Толкования Ванги имеет пророческий характер. Ванга утверждала, что сновидения раскрывают тайные смыслы и помогают человеку понять важные события.
<a href="https://bakdd.ru/sonnik-videt-sebya-s-korotkoi-strizhkoi-korotkaya-striz...Сонник Цветкова</a>
Толкования по Цветкову содержит множество символов. Цветков отмечал, что сны — это ключи к пониманию внутренних переживаний.
<a href="https://islamvevrazii.ru/sonnik-led-katatsya-na-ldu-provalitsya-pod-led-...Магический сонник</a>
Толкования Магического сонника основан на мистике. Большинство образов имеют магическое значение.
<a href="https://www.yourdreams.ru/biblio/pages/alfred-adler-iptn-2.php">Лунный сонник</a>
Сны по Лунному соннику связан с лунным циклом. По этому соннику, что фаза Луны влияет на яркость и смысл снов.
<a href="https://1001oracul.ru/love/k-chemu-snitsya-umershaya-snoha-k-chemu-snits...Славянский сонник</a>
Славянский сонник основан на древних верованиях. Сон в славянской традиции мог содержать предостережение.
<a href="http://kabanik.ru/page/land-of-nod">Семейный сонник</a>
Семейный сонник подходит для всех членов семьи. Толкования семейного сонника близкие нам символы.
<a href="http://kabanik.ru/page/land-of-nod">Русский сонник</a>
Русский сонник базируется на народной мудрости. Толкования отражают древние верования и включают известные образы.
<a href="http://www.myslash.ru/Products/dirid_34/tek_641/">Мусульманский сонник</a>
Исламский сонник содержит религиозные символы. В мусульманской традиции сон интерпретируется с точки зрения религии.
Интерпретация сновидений поможет лучше понять свою жизнь и даст возможность заглянуть в будущее.
http://gatchina3000.ru/eggs/20/narodniy-kalendar-svyatki.htm
https://cardul.ru/k-chemu-snitsya-hryushka-k-chemu-snyatsya-kabany-i-svi...
https://minezone.ru/vitamins/k-chemu-snitsya-chto-muzh-brosil-menya-bros...
http://www.socioforum.ru/post44775.html
http://belkon.ru/content/view/867/9/
[url=https://ambex.io/ticket/view/46438300]Значение снов по сонникам — Фрейда[/url]
[url=http://pc3v.fr/photos/singleimage/PokerBeach2015/IMG_0182-jpg/?success=t...Расшифровка сна по традициям — Нострадамуса и других[/url]
[url=https://adcornerbd.com/ticket/view/59060100]Значение снов по известным толкователям — Фрейда[/url]
4d2617c
Josephmes (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:36
The survivors of recentThe survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken зайти</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken darknet onion
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
Victorsek (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:37
Scientists have identified anScientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>кракен</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
kra cc
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
DanielDence (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:38
Most plane crashes areMost plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra23c.cc
kra23 cc
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
can i get cheap... (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:43
Drug information. Cautions.Drug information. Cautions.
<a href="https://diflucan1day.top/">can i get cheap diflucan without dr prescription</a>
All news about drugs. Read information here.
jonitogelSiteO4... (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:45
<a href=https://linkr.bio<a href=https://linkr.bio/jonitogel.id>jonitogel</a>
Barryplaiz (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:45
buy erectile dysfunctionbuy erectile dysfunction medication: <a href=" http://fastpillseasy.com/# ">FastPillsEasy</a> - buy ed meds online
BrettWAX (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:49
https://victoriamotorsinc.comhttps://victoriamotorsinc.com/ - wrecked cars for sale nissan vin lookup
FrankAtrog (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:51
<a href=https:/<a href=https://victoriamotorsinc.com/>car auctions near me</a> ferrari vin lookup
JacobZok (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:51
<a href=https://dryshop.ru/<a href=https://dryshop.ru/>https://dryshop.ru/</a> — проектирование и изготовление мебели, которая подходит именно вам.
Robertatosy (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:54
Заказать изготовление поЗаказать изготовление по индивидуальному дизайну или купть памятник по выгодной цене Вы можете в нашей Гранитной мастерской <a href="https://nisp.ru">смотреть онлайн бесплатно</a>
Donaldnob (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:57
Buy Tadalafil 10mg [url=httpsBuy Tadalafil 10mg [url=https://maxpillsformen.com/#]MaxPillsForMen[/url] buy cialis pill
BrianMailk (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 19:59
New Glenn’s first flightNew Glenn’s first flight
Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
<a href=https://kra23att.cc>kraken зайти</a>
The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.
Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.
Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car.
https://kra23att.cc
kraken магазин
Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.
The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.
“We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.
And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.
generic51.ru (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:00
https://generic51.ruhttps://generic51.ru/kombinirovannye
DanielBor (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:04
A year ago today, things wentA year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken войти</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
Cosmoscouh (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:15
Привет, господа.Привет, господа.
Я увидел превосходный сайт [url=cosmotrah.com]Анкеты шлюх Тюмени[/url].
Тут размещены анкеты отличных девушек легкого поведения из города Тюмень.
Выбор просто великолепный по адекватным ценам.
[url=cosmotrah.com]Анкеты девиц легкого поведения Тюмени[/url].
https://cosmotrah.com
<a href="https://cosmotrah.com">проститутки тюмени</a>
Всего лишь поделился :)
neodimof.ru (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:19
https://neodimof.ru/https://neodimof.ru/
neodimof.ru (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:24
https://neodimof.ru/https://neodimof.ru/
http://bipkro.r... (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:25
<a href="http://bipkro.ru<a href="http://bipkro.ru/includes/article/zerkala_54.html">http://bipkro.ru/incl...
neodimof.ru (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:32
https://neodimof.ru/https://neodimof.ru/
Georgeguilt (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:35
Scientists have identified anScientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken darknet onion</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken войти
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
CoreyAbido (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:36
Most plane crashes areMost plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken тор</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken войти
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
DavidReS (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:36
The survivors of recentThe survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>кракен ссылка</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken тор
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
dual pain relie... (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:39
Medicine information. WhatMedicine information. What side effects can this medication cause?
<a href="https://diclofenac24h.top/dual-pain-relief-unlocking-the-power-of-diclof... pain relief unlocking the power of diclofenac epolamine combined with naproxen</a>
Best about medicament. Read information here.
https://mdou70.... (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:39
<a href="https://mdou70.68edu<a href="https://mdou70.68edu.ru/wp-content/pgs/1xbet_zerkalo_alternativnuy_dostu...
Robertatosy (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:42
Заказать изготовление поЗаказать изготовление по индивидуальному дизайну или купть памятник по выгодной цене Вы можете в нашей Гранитной мастерской <a href="https://nisp.ru">русское бесплатно</a>
neodimof.ru (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:42
https://neodimof.ru/https://neodimof.ru/
Floydhof (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:43
A year ago today, things wentA year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>Кракен даркнет</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
gore36 (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:49
<a href="https://goreotuma2<a href="https://goreotuma2.ru">gore4</a>
oborudovaniye_p... (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:53
Интерактивные панели иИнтерактивные панели и акустика: оборудование для переговорных комнат
оснащение переговорных [url=https://www.oborudovaniye-peregovornykh-komnat1.ru]https://www.oborudova... .
MatthewRalse (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 20:57
Займ на карту без отказа —Займ на карту без отказа — это быстрое и удобное решение для тех, кто нуждается в финансовой помощи: простая онлайн-заявка, минимальные требования к заемщику и мгновенное одобрение, что позволяет получить необходимую сумму практически незамедлительно, а также возможность быстро погасить задолженность, делая процесс максимально комфортным и прозрачным для каждого <a href="https://vc.ru/money/1745226-top-17-novyh-mfo-kotorye-odobryayut-zaimy-na...займы на карту онлайн</a>
kdwstjt (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 21:05
<a href="https://goreotuma.ru<a href="https://goreotuma.ru">gore2</a>
neodimof.ru (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 21:32
https://neodimof.ru/https://neodimof.ru/
how to get chea... (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 21:39
Pills information leaflet.Pills information leaflet. Brand names.
<a href="https://ampicillin1day.top/">how to get cheap ampicillin pill</a>
Actual information about drugs. Get now.
generic51.ru (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 21:43
https://generic51.ruhttps://generic51.ru/kombinirovannye
Williambiz (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 21:43
Viagra generic over theViagra generic over the counter <a href=" http://www.e10100.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=3101402 ">viagra without prescription</a> or <a href=" https://cse.google.com.cu/url?sa=i&url=http://fastpillsformen.com ">Order Viagra 50 mg online</a>
http://fishingkuban.ru/forum/away.php?s=http://fastpillsformen.com sildenafil over the counter
[url=http://images.google.com.ai/url?q=https://fastpillsformen.com]sildenafil online[/url] Sildenafil Citrate Tablets 100mg and [url=http://www.e10100.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=3099634]Viagra without a doctor prescription Canada[/url] Order Viagra 50 mg online
KennethAlkax (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 21:46
Most plane crashes areMost plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken магазин</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken войти
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
WesleyIdelo (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 21:47
Scientists have identified anScientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken darknet</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
кракен онион
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
Jerometow (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 21:50
The survivors of recentThe survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken market</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken вход
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
generic51.ru (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 21:53
https://generic51.ruhttps://generic51.ru/kombinirovannye
Matthewwak (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 22:02
A year ago today, things wentA year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken darknet</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra23c.cc
kra cc
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
buying generic mobic (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 22:06
Medication information forMedication information for patients. What side effects can this medication cause?
<a href="https://mobic1day.top/">buying generic mobic</a>
All what you want to know about drug. Read here.
Robertatosy (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 22:06
Заказать изготовление поЗаказать изготовление по индивидуальному дизайну или купть памятник по выгодной цене Вы можете в нашей Гранитной мастерской <a href="https://nisp.ru">Памятник в рассрочку бесплатно</a>
BrettWAX (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 22:07
url=https://victoriamotorsincurl=https://victoriamotorsinc.com/car auctions/url mercury vin number lookup
FrankAtrog (non vérifié)
jeu, 09/01/2025 - 22:08
online car auction ferrarionline car auction ferrari vin number lookup
Pages
Poster un commentaire